Embolia polmonare ed algoritmi diagnostici

Contenuto principale dell'articolo

Paolo Prandoni

Abstract

In questa review affronteremo alcuni aspetti relativi al processo diagnostico in relazione ai quadri clinici di embolia polmonare considerando i differenti score di rischio, citando gli studi più noti e recenti, gli strumenti clinico-pratici attualmente disponibili e gli algoritmi diagnostici a nostra disposizione.

Downloads

I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili

Dettagli dell'articolo

Come citare
[1]
Prandoni, P. 2020. Embolia polmonare ed algoritmi diagnostici. Italian Journal of Prevention, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Medicine. 3, 3 (giu. 2020), 6-9. DOI:https://doi.org/10.30459/2020-15.
Sezione
Review

Riferimenti bibliografici

Klok FA, Mos IC, Nijkeuter M, et al. Simplification of the revised Geneva score for assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern

Med 2008;168(19):2131-36.

Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, et al. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thromb Haemost 2000;83(3):416-20.

van Belle A, Büller HR, Huisman MV, et al; Christopher Study Investigators. Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography. JAMA 2006;295(2):172-9.

Righini M, Van Es J, Den Exter PL, et al. Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism: the ADJUST-PE study. JAMA 2014;311(11):1117-24.

van der Hulle T, Cheung WY, Kooij S, et al; YEARS study group. Simplified diagnostic management of suspected pulmonary embolism (the YEARS study): a prospective, multicentre, cohort study. Lancet 2017;390(10091):289-97.

van der Pol LM, Tromeur C, Bistervels IM, et al; Artemis Study Investigators. Pregnancy-adapted YEARS algorithm for diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 2019;380(12):1139-49.

van der Pol LM, Bistervels IM, van Mens TE, et al. Lower prevalence of subsegmental pulmonary embolism after application of the YEARS diagnostic algorithm. Br J Haematol 2018;183(4):629-35.

Kearon C, de Wit K, Parpia S, et al; PEGeD Study Investigators. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with d-dimer adjusted to clinical probability. N Engl J Med 2019;381(22):2125-34.

Wells PS, Anderson DR, Bormanis J, et al. Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep-vein thrombosis in clinical management. Lancet 1997;350(9094):1795-98.

Bernardi E, Camporese G, Büller HR; Erasmus Study Group. Serial 2-point ultrasonography plus D-dimer vs whole-leg color-coded Doppler ultrasonography for diagnosing suspected symptomatic deep vein thrombosis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2008;300(14):1653-59.

Ageno W, Camporese G, Riva N; PALLADIO Study Investigators. Analysis of an algorithm incorporating limited and whole-leg assessment of the deep venous system in symptomatic outpatients with suspected deep-vein thrombosis (PALLADIO): a prospective, multicentre, cohort study. Lancet Haematol 2015;2(11):e474-80.

Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C, et al; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J 2019 Aug 31. pii: ehz405. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz405 [Epub ahead of print].