Intelligenza Artificiale, pensiero critico ed emozioni: Implicazioni Psicologiche, Cliniche ed Etiche

Contenuto principale dell'articolo

Vanessa Zurkirch
NicolaNicola Gualteri
Francesco Regoli
Laura Belloni

Abstract

L’adozione crescente di sistemi di Intelligenza Artificiale, in particolare dei chatbot generativi, nei contesti clinici, formativi e di supporto psicologico solleva interrogativi che vanno oltre l’efficienza tecnologica, investendo direttamente i processi cognitivi, emotivi e relazionali dell’essere umano.


Il presente articolo propone un’analisi teorico-critica dell’impatto dell’IA sul pensiero critico, sulla regolazione emotiva e sulla relazione di cura, integrando prospettive della psicologia cognitiva, della clinica e della riflessione psicodinamica.


Viene esaminato il rischio di una progressiva esternalizzazione delle funzioni riflessive e decisionali, con particolare attenzione ai fenomeni di cognitive offloading, dipendenza cognitiva, idealizzazione dell’oggetto tecnologico e antropomorfizzazione. Sul piano emotivo e relazionale, si analizza il significato della simulazione dell’empatia nei sistemi di IA e il suo possibile effetto sull’alleanza terapeutica, sugli stili di attaccamento e sui processi di simbolizzazione del legame, evidenziando i limiti strutturali dell’IA nel partecipare a un’esperienza intersoggettiva autentica.


Accanto ai rischi, l’articolo discute, inoltre, le potenzialità applicative dell’IA in ambito clinico e psicoeducativo, sottolineando la necessità di un’integrazione consapevole che preservi l’agency del soggetto, il giudizio clinico e la centralità della relazione umana. In conclusione, si sostiene che l’IA non debba essere concepita come sostituto del pensiero o della cura, ma come strumento subordinato a cornici etiche, cliniche ed epistemologiche capaci di tutelare la complessità dell’esperienza psicologica e relazionale.

Downloads

I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili

Dettagli dell'articolo

Come citare
[1]
Zurkirch, V., Gualteri, N., Regoli, F. e Belloni, L. 2026. Intelligenza Artificiale, pensiero critico ed emozioni:: Implicazioni Psicologiche, Cliniche ed Etiche. Italian Journal of Prevention, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Medicine. 9, 1 (mar. 2026), 97-104. DOI:https://doi.org/10.30459/2026-13.
Sezione
Rubrica

Riferimenti bibliografici

• Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Longman.

• Bleger, J. (1967). Psicoanalisi del setting psicoanalitico. In J. Bleger, Psicoanalisi e dialettica (pp. xx–xx). Armando.

• Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Basic Books.

• Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. J. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7

• Diemerling, E., et al. (2024). Machine learning approaches for emotion recognition from voice. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

• Dunning, D., & Kruger, J. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121

• Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864–886. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864

• Fisher, M., Goddu, M. K., & Keil, F. C. (2015). Searching for explanations: How the Internet inflates estimates of internal knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(3), 674–687. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000070

• Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B., Valcke, P., & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5

• Freud, S. (1920). Beyond the pleasure principle. Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag.

• Gerlich, M. (2025). AI tools in society: Impacts on cognitive offloading and critical thinking. Sociology Journal of Emerging Tech, 15(1), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/society15010006

• Greenfield, D. N. (2025, April 8). 5 ways AI is changing human relationships. Psychology Today.

• Klein, M. (1957). Envy and gratitude and other works 1946–1963. Hogarth Press.

• Lee, H.-P., Sarkar, A., Tankelevitch, L., Drosos, I., Rintel, S., Banks, R., & Wilson, N. (2025). The impact of generative AI on critical thinking: Self-reported reductions in cognitive effort and confidence effects from a survey of knowledge workers. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–22). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/XXXXXXX

• Luxton, D. D. (2020). Ethical implications of conversational agents in global public health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 98(4), 285–287. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.19.237636

• MIT Media Lab. (2025, April 8). How AI and human behaviors shape psychosocial effects of chatbot use: A longitudinal controlled study.

• Montag, C., et al. (2024). Artificial intelligence in mental health research and practice. Current Opinion in Psychology.

• Ogden, T. H. (1994). The analytic third: Working with intersubjective clinical facts. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 75, 3–19.

• Pearson, H. (2025). Are the Internet and AI affecting our memory? What the science says. Nature, 638(8049), 26–28. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-00292-z

• Rhodes, J. E. (2024, November 15). New study explores artificial intelligence (AI) and empathy in caring relationships. The Chronicle of Evidence-Based Mentoring.

• Risko, E. F., & Gilbert, S. J. (2016). Cognitive offloading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(9), 676–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002

• Rubin, M., et al. (2024). Empathy in AI-mediated healthcare communication. Journal of Medical Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/XXXXX

• Sajjad, M., et al. (2023). Facial expression recognition for mental health assessment. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.XXXXX

• Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3), 417–457. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005756

• Sparrow, B., Liu, J., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, 333(6043), 776–778. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207745

• Stern, D. B. (2004). The eye sees itself: Dissociation, enactment, and the achievement of mutual recognition. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 14(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10481881409348731

• Svendsen, K. (2013). Anthropomorphism and projection: The importance of understanding the mind of social robots. AI & Society, 28(3), 345–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-012-0427-8

• Tai-Seale, M., Baxter, S. L., Vaida, F., et al. (2024). AI-generated draft replies integrated into health records and physicians’ electronic communication. JAMA Network Open, 7(4), e246565. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.6565

• Winnicott, D. W. (1960). Ego distortion in terms of true and false self. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 41, 140–152.

• Yin, Y., Jia, N., & Wakslak, C. J. (2024). AI can help people feel heard, but an AI label diminishes this impact. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(21), e2319112121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2319112121

• Zhai, C., et al. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on learners’ critical thinking and problem-solving abilities: A systematic literature review. Smart Learning Environments, 11, Article 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7

Puoi leggere altri articoli dello stesso autore/i