Intelligenza Artificiale, pensiero critico ed emozioni: Implicazioni Psicologiche, Cliniche ed Etiche
Contenuto principale dell'articolo
Abstract
L’adozione crescente di sistemi di Intelligenza Artificiale, in particolare dei chatbot generativi, nei contesti clinici, formativi e di supporto psicologico solleva interrogativi che vanno oltre l’efficienza tecnologica, investendo direttamente i processi cognitivi, emotivi e relazionali dell’essere umano.
Il presente articolo propone un’analisi teorico-critica dell’impatto dell’IA sul pensiero critico, sulla regolazione emotiva e sulla relazione di cura, integrando prospettive della psicologia cognitiva, della clinica e della riflessione psicodinamica.
Viene esaminato il rischio di una progressiva esternalizzazione delle funzioni riflessive e decisionali, con particolare attenzione ai fenomeni di cognitive offloading, dipendenza cognitiva, idealizzazione dell’oggetto tecnologico e antropomorfizzazione. Sul piano emotivo e relazionale, si analizza il significato della simulazione dell’empatia nei sistemi di IA e il suo possibile effetto sull’alleanza terapeutica, sugli stili di attaccamento e sui processi di simbolizzazione del legame, evidenziando i limiti strutturali dell’IA nel partecipare a un’esperienza intersoggettiva autentica.
Accanto ai rischi, l’articolo discute, inoltre, le potenzialità applicative dell’IA in ambito clinico e psicoeducativo, sottolineando la necessità di un’integrazione consapevole che preservi l’agency del soggetto, il giudizio clinico e la centralità della relazione umana. In conclusione, si sostiene che l’IA non debba essere concepita come sostituto del pensiero o della cura, ma come strumento subordinato a cornici etiche, cliniche ed epistemologiche capaci di tutelare la complessità dell’esperienza psicologica e relazionale.
Downloads
Dettagli dell'articolo

Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale 4.0 Internazionale.
Riferimenti bibliografici
• Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Longman.
• Bleger, J. (1967). Psicoanalisi del setting psicoanalitico. In J. Bleger, Psicoanalisi e dialettica (pp. xx–xx). Armando.
• Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Basic Books.
• Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. J. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7
• Diemerling, E., et al. (2024). Machine learning approaches for emotion recognition from voice. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.
• Dunning, D., & Kruger, J. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121
• Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864–886. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864
• Fisher, M., Goddu, M. K., & Keil, F. C. (2015). Searching for explanations: How the Internet inflates estimates of internal knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(3), 674–687. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000070
• Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B., Valcke, P., & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
• Freud, S. (1920). Beyond the pleasure principle. Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag.
• Gerlich, M. (2025). AI tools in society: Impacts on cognitive offloading and critical thinking. Sociology Journal of Emerging Tech, 15(1), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/society15010006
• Greenfield, D. N. (2025, April 8). 5 ways AI is changing human relationships. Psychology Today.
• Klein, M. (1957). Envy and gratitude and other works 1946–1963. Hogarth Press.
• Lee, H.-P., Sarkar, A., Tankelevitch, L., Drosos, I., Rintel, S., Banks, R., & Wilson, N. (2025). The impact of generative AI on critical thinking: Self-reported reductions in cognitive effort and confidence effects from a survey of knowledge workers. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–22). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/XXXXXXX
• Luxton, D. D. (2020). Ethical implications of conversational agents in global public health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 98(4), 285–287. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.19.237636
• MIT Media Lab. (2025, April 8). How AI and human behaviors shape psychosocial effects of chatbot use: A longitudinal controlled study.
• Montag, C., et al. (2024). Artificial intelligence in mental health research and practice. Current Opinion in Psychology.
• Ogden, T. H. (1994). The analytic third: Working with intersubjective clinical facts. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 75, 3–19.
• Pearson, H. (2025). Are the Internet and AI affecting our memory? What the science says. Nature, 638(8049), 26–28. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-00292-z
• Rhodes, J. E. (2024, November 15). New study explores artificial intelligence (AI) and empathy in caring relationships. The Chronicle of Evidence-Based Mentoring.
• Risko, E. F., & Gilbert, S. J. (2016). Cognitive offloading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(9), 676–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002
• Rubin, M., et al. (2024). Empathy in AI-mediated healthcare communication. Journal of Medical Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/XXXXX
• Sajjad, M., et al. (2023). Facial expression recognition for mental health assessment. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.XXXXX
• Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3), 417–457. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005756
• Sparrow, B., Liu, J., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, 333(6043), 776–778. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207745
• Stern, D. B. (2004). The eye sees itself: Dissociation, enactment, and the achievement of mutual recognition. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 14(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10481881409348731
• Svendsen, K. (2013). Anthropomorphism and projection: The importance of understanding the mind of social robots. AI & Society, 28(3), 345–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-012-0427-8
• Tai-Seale, M., Baxter, S. L., Vaida, F., et al. (2024). AI-generated draft replies integrated into health records and physicians’ electronic communication. JAMA Network Open, 7(4), e246565. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.6565
• Winnicott, D. W. (1960). Ego distortion in terms of true and false self. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 41, 140–152.
• Yin, Y., Jia, N., & Wakslak, C. J. (2024). AI can help people feel heard, but an AI label diminishes this impact. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(21), e2319112121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2319112121
• Zhai, C., et al. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on learners’ critical thinking and problem-solving abilities: A systematic literature review. Smart Learning Environments, 11, Article 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7